> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.vumasign.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Send a draft envelope to its recipients.

> THE SECOND HALF OF THE CREATED-VERSUS-SENT SPLIT. `POST /api/v1/envelopes` with `"send": false` makes a draft and emails nobody; this is how that draft goes out. Two acts an integrator can separate — build the envelope when a form is submitted, send it when a human approves — which is the arrangement a one-shot create cannot express without either sending too early or holding a request open.

⚠️ A SUB-RESOURCE AND NOT `PATCH {"status": "sent"}`. Sending emails people, consumes billing allowance and writes an audit event; making that look like editing a property would make an irreversible, billable act look reversible.

**200, not 201.** Nothing was created — the envelope existed before this call. A client branching on 201 to mean "store this new id" would be wrong here every time.

## The idempotency, which is the point

⚠️ `Idempotency-Key` IS REQUIRED. None of DocuSign, Dropbox Sign or BoldSign offers one on the endpoint that costs real money; this is that endpoint, and an optional guarantee is one nobody sends until they have already been burned.

A REPLAY MEANS "you already sent this, and here is what happened" — the first attempt’s answer, byte for byte, with `Idempotency-Replayed: true`. Not a second send, not a resend, not a refusal. That is what makes a timeout safe to retry.

A DIFFERENT ENVELOPE UNDER A USED KEY IS `idempotency_key_reused`, never a replay — including a key you already used to CREATE something. A key identifies one request.

KEYS ARE REMEMBERED FOR 1 DAY, per organisation and per environment. Past that the same string is a new request — and a new request to send an envelope that has already gone out is `envelope_not_draft`, not a second send. Two mechanisms, and the second one is the database: `draft → sent` is a locked, one-way transition, so a duplicate send is impossible whatever the key says. The key decides what the second caller is TOLD.

## What it refuses

A REFUSAL SENDS NOTHING AND CHANGES NOTHING. The envelope is left exactly as it was — unlike a refused `"send": true` on the create endpoint, which deletes the draft it had just built — and the idempotency key is freed, so a caller who upgrades their plan or fixes their roster retries with the same key.

⚠️ A `vsk_test_` KEY MAY SEND ONLY A SANDBOX ENVELOPE — one a test key created — and only to people it may email. A draft a live key created is refused with `test_key_cannot_send`, and so is one whose emailed recipients include an address that is neither a member of your organisation nor a confirmed test recipient (Settings → Test recipients). An `"embedded": true` recipient is never emailed and is never checked. A test send consumes no allowance.



## OpenAPI

````yaml /openapi.json post /api/v1/envelopes/{envelopeId}/send
openapi: 3.1.0
info:
  title: Vumasign API
  version: 0.1.0
  description: >-
    The Vumasign API. South African e-signature: templates, the addresses an

    integration writes values to, an idempotent send, and webhooks.


    **This document describes what exists today and nothing else.** It is not a

    roadmap, and there is deliberately no entry here for anything that has not

    shipped — a spec you can generate a client from and then discover was

    aspirational is worse than no spec at all.


    ## Authentication

        Authorization: Bearer vsk_live_…

    One header, one step. Keys are minted in Settings. `vsk_live_` and
    `vsk_test_`

    are different keys; the prefix is stored in clear so a leaked key is
    greppable

    and traceable to an organisation, while the secret is stored only as a hash.


    ## Errors


    Every refusal the API returns deliberately, at every status, is

    `{ "error": { "code", "message" } }`, and such a response is a failure **if

    and only if** it carries an `error` key — that test is correct even for a

    client that ignores the status line. An unexpected server failure may not
    have

    this shape: treat a 5xx without an `error` key as an `internal_error`, which

    is retryable. `code` is the

    contract and is stable forever; `message` is prose for a developer reading a

    log and may be reworded in any release.


    The root of this document carries **`x-error-codes`**: the closed enum, with

    `status`, `retryable`, `backoff`, `emitted` and `guidance` for each

    code. Branch on that rather than on our prose.


    ## Rate limits


    **600 requests a minute on any paid plan,

    60 on the free plan — and a test key

    gets the same number as a live one.** Per key, not per organisation, so a
    batch

    job and an interactive integration can be given a key each and neither can

    starve the other.


    The ceiling follows the PLAN rather than the kind of key, because the plan
    is

    what says whether this is production traffic or somebody evaluating us. On
    the

    API plan it is sized so that no honest workload meets it: a thousand
    envelopes

    with a status read each is two thousand requests, which is three and a half

    minutes rather than seventeen. The sandbox deliberately gets the *same*
    number

    rather than a larger one — an integration that passes in rehearsal is then
    an

    integration that passes live, and your `429` handling is exercised where

    meeting a `429` is free.


    Every successful authenticated response carries `RateLimit-Limit`,

    `RateLimit-Remaining` and `RateLimit-Reset` (seconds until the window

    closes, at most 60). Read them on your successes and you will never need to
    be

    refused. A 429 carries them too, and additionally carries `Retry-After`,
    which

    you should honour. A 401 carries none of them; a 403 may not, depending on

    whether it was decided before the request was counted. Each operation's

    responses say which others do.


    ⚠️ **A refused request still counts.** Retrying inside the window pushes the

    counter higher rather than holding it at the ceiling — which is why the
    backoff

    in `x-error-codes` is exponential and why `Retry-After` is worth reading

    rather than guessing at.


    ⚠️ The limits are **per minute**, and the window is fixed rather than
    sliding.

    Spending a whole window at the end of one minute and a whole window at the
    start

    of the next is possible; it is bounded at two windows' worth, which is a
    burst

    rather than an incident.


    ## Webhooks


    Register an endpoint with `POST /api/v1/webhooks`; the response carries the

    signing secret, **once**. The root of this document carries
    **`x-webhooks`**:

    the body we POST, the signature recipe (including the two mistakes that make
    a

    verifier look correct and be worthless), the published retry ladder, and the

    auto-disable rule. Read that before writing a receiver.


    ## What is not here yet


    No organisation-level email exists, so an auto-disabled webhook endpoint is

    discovered by polling rather than by being told. There is no way to change
    an

    envelope after it is created and before it is sent — `PATCH
    /v1/envelopes/{id}`

    is designed and not built — so a draft is created complete or not at all.
    Both

    are stated because a gap named is a gap somebody can plan around.


    ⚠️ **The rate limit above counts authenticated requests only.** A request

    carrying no key, or a key we cannot recognise, is refused before any counter
    is

    touched — a per-key ceiling cannot defend against a caller who has not
    presented

    a key, and pretending otherwise would be a promise we could not keep. That
    half

    belongs to the edge rather than to this API.


    (This section has twice described as missing something that now exists: the

    `uri` on every webhook body, which was `null` until

    `GET /api/v1/envelopes/{envelopeId}` gave it somewhere to point, and the
    rate

    limiter, which nothing enforced until the per-key ceiling above. Both were
    named

    here as gaps first, which is the point of naming them.)
servers:
  - url: https://app.vumasign.com
security:
  - ApiKey: []
tags:
  - name: Templates
    description: >-
      A template is a document with its signing roles and field placements
      authored once. Every envelope is made from one, or from a one-off pack.
  - name: Documents
    description: >-
      The pages of a template’s documents, served as PDF so that a client which
      has to show the paper can do so without rendering it itself.
  - name: Envelopes
    description: >-
      An envelope is one sending of a document to named people. Creating one is
      not sending it: a draft emails nobody until it is sent.
  - name: Webhooks
    description: >-
      Endpoints we POST signed events to when an envelope changes, with the
      health of each endpoint and a secret you can rotate without a gap.
  - name: Specification
    description: >-
      This document, served without a credential so that anybody can read what
      the API does before they hold a key.
paths:
  /api/v1/envelopes/{envelopeId}/send:
    post:
      tags:
        - Envelopes
      summary: Send a draft envelope to its recipients.
      description: >-
        THE SECOND HALF OF THE CREATED-VERSUS-SENT SPLIT. `POST
        /api/v1/envelopes` with `"send": false` makes a draft and emails nobody;
        this is how that draft goes out. Two acts an integrator can separate —
        build the envelope when a form is submitted, send it when a human
        approves — which is the arrangement a one-shot create cannot express
        without either sending too early or holding a request open.


        ⚠️ A SUB-RESOURCE AND NOT `PATCH {"status": "sent"}`. Sending emails
        people, consumes billing allowance and writes an audit event; making
        that look like editing a property would make an irreversible, billable
        act look reversible.


        **200, not 201.** Nothing was created — the envelope existed before this
        call. A client branching on 201 to mean "store this new id" would be
        wrong here every time.


        ## The idempotency, which is the point


        ⚠️ `Idempotency-Key` IS REQUIRED. None of DocuSign, Dropbox Sign or
        BoldSign offers one on the endpoint that costs real money; this is that
        endpoint, and an optional guarantee is one nobody sends until they have
        already been burned.


        A REPLAY MEANS "you already sent this, and here is what happened" — the
        first attempt’s answer, byte for byte, with `Idempotency-Replayed:
        true`. Not a second send, not a resend, not a refusal. That is what
        makes a timeout safe to retry.


        A DIFFERENT ENVELOPE UNDER A USED KEY IS `idempotency_key_reused`, never
        a replay — including a key you already used to CREATE something. A key
        identifies one request.


        KEYS ARE REMEMBERED FOR 1 DAY, per organisation and per environment.
        Past that the same string is a new request — and a new request to send
        an envelope that has already gone out is `envelope_not_draft`, not a
        second send. Two mechanisms, and the second one is the database: `draft
        → sent` is a locked, one-way transition, so a duplicate send is
        impossible whatever the key says. The key decides what the second caller
        is TOLD.


        ## What it refuses


        A REFUSAL SENDS NOTHING AND CHANGES NOTHING. The envelope is left
        exactly as it was — unlike a refused `"send": true` on the create
        endpoint, which deletes the draft it had just built — and the
        idempotency key is freed, so a caller who upgrades their plan or fixes
        their roster retries with the same key.


        ⚠️ A `vsk_test_` KEY MAY SEND ONLY A SANDBOX ENVELOPE — one a test key
        created — and only to people it may email. A draft a live key created is
        refused with `test_key_cannot_send`, and so is one whose emailed
        recipients include an address that is neither a member of your
        organisation nor a confirmed test recipient (Settings → Test
        recipients). An `"embedded": true` recipient is never emailed and is
        never checked. A test send consumes no allowance.
      operationId: sendEnvelope
      parameters:
        - name: envelopeId
          in: path
          required: true
          description: The draft envelope’s `id`, as returned when it was created.
          schema:
            type: string
            format: uuid
            examples:
              - 01960000-0000-4000-8000-0000000000e5
            description: An envelope id.
        - name: Idempotency-Key
          in: header
          required: true
          description: >-
            Any string that identifies this request; a UUID is the usual choice,
            and at most 255 characters. ⚠️ REQUIRED. Without it a timeout is
            unresolvable: you cannot learn whether the envelope went out, and
            retrying either sends it twice or tells you it is not a draft
            without saying who sent it.
          schema:
            type: string
            examples:
              - 01960000-0000-4000-8000-00000000ffff
            description: The caller’s own request identifier.
      responses:
        '200':
          description: >-
            The envelope, now `sent`. `invitation_delivered` on each recipient
            is what the email provider said about that invitation — `null` where
            none was attempted, which on a `sequential` envelope is every
            position after the first.


            ⚠️ HERE, AND ONLY HERE, `true` MEANS "THE PROVIDER ACCEPTED IT"
            RATHER THAN "THE PROVIDER DELIVERED IT". This response is built from
            the answers the provider gave while the send was running, and at
            that moment nobody — us or them — knows whether the message will
            arrive. Delivery is reported afterwards, and `GET
            /api/v1/envelopes/{id}` is where it shows up. If the distinction
            matters to you, re-read there rather than trusting this snapshot.


            ⚠️ A recipient still reading `pending` after a successful send is
            NORMAL on a sequential envelope, not a failure.
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                $ref: '#/components/schemas/Envelope'
                description: The envelope, as it now stands.
              examples:
                example:
                  summary: Sent, and accepted by the email provider
                  value:
                    id: 01960000-0000-4000-8000-0000000000e5
                    status: sent
                    template_id: 01960000-0000-4000-8000-0000000007e1
                    title: Employment contract
                    reference: hire-2026-0917
                    created_at: '2026-09-02T09:00:00.000Z'
                    sent_at: '2026-09-02T09:05:00.000Z'
                    expires_at: null
                    recipients:
                      - id: 01960000-0000-4000-8000-00000000005e
                        role: Employee
                        name: Thandi Mokoena
                        email: thandi@example.test
                        routing_type: sign
                        status: sent
                        invitation_delivered: true
                        embedded: false
                        external_ref: null
          headers:
            RateLimit-Limit:
              description: >-
                How many requests this key may make per minute: 600 on any paid
                plan and 60 on the free plan, the same in both environments. Per
                key, not per organisation — a second key has its own allowance.
                ⚠️ READ IT RATHER THAN ASSUMING IT: it is the number the
                database applied to this request, so it is right even when this
                description is out of date.
              schema:
                type: integer
                description: Requests permitted in the current minute.
            RateLimit-Remaining:
              description: >-
                How many of them are left, this one already counted. Zero on the
                request that is refused, and zero on every further request of
                that minute — ⚠️ a refused request still counts.
              schema:
                type: integer
                description: Requests remaining in the current minute.
            RateLimit-Reset:
              description: >-
                Seconds until the current minute closes and the allowance
                returns. At most 60, which is what makes the published
                exponential backoff converge in about six doublings rather than
                eleven.
              schema:
                type: integer
                description: Seconds until the window resets.
        '400':
          description: >-
            `invalid_request` — The request is malformed, or breaks a rule about
            its own shape: a body that is not JSON or does not match the
            operation’s schema (a missing or mistyped property, a value out of
            range), a document that is not a PDF or a Word file we can read, a
            text tag that cannot be placed, an `Idempotency-Key` that is present
            but not a valid key, a query parameter outside its range, or a
            cursor that names nothing. The `message` says which, and for a body
            names the property path (`recipients[0].email`) — there is no
            separate `param` field. Fix the request; retrying it unchanged will
            fail identically.


            `idempotency_key_required` — Send `Idempotency-Key: <uuid>` — this
            operation takes one and the request carried none. A distinct code
            from `invalid_request` because the remedy is to ADD a header, and an
            integrator reading it in a log should not have to work that out. (A
            key that is present but malformed is `invalid_request`, and its
            `message` names the header.)
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                $ref: '#/components/schemas/Error'
                description: The refusal.
        '401':
          description: >-
            `unauthenticated` — The credential was absent, unreadable, unknown,
            wrong or revoked — this answer is deliberately identical for all of
            them, so it cannot be used to probe which keys exist. Retrying the
            same request changes nothing. Check the key in Settings or issue a
            new one.
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                $ref: '#/components/schemas/Error'
                description: The refusal.
        '402':
          description: >-
            `send_allowance_exhausted` — ⚠️ 402, THE ONLY STATUS IN THIS API
            THAT NAMES MONEY. Not 403 (the credential is permitted; the plan is
            not) and not 429 (waiting does not help until the month turns).
            Upgrade the plan, or wait for the period to roll over. ⚠️ RETRYING
            IS POINTLESS BUT NOT HARMFUL — nothing was created, so there is no
            partial envelope to clean up. Only the Free plan (5 documents a
            month) is ever blocked, once that many documents have been sent in
            the month; every other plan is counted and never stopped, and a
            `vsk_test_` key never meets this at all because a sandbox envelope
            consumes no allowance to exhaust.
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                $ref: '#/components/schemas/Error'
                description: The refusal.
        '403':
          description: >-
            `forbidden` — The key is valid and the organisation’s plan does not
            grant what this operation does. Nothing about the credential needs
            to change, and it is deliberately MORE specific than 401 because the
            caller has already proved they hold the key. TWO SITUATIONS PRODUCE
            IT. (1) THE PLAN EXCLUDES THE OPERATION: `POST /api/v1/templates` on
            the Free plan, which does not include authoring templates. A
            template that already exists stays readable at `GET
            /api/v1/templates`; authoring one needs a plan that includes
            templates. (2) WE CANNOT ESTABLISH WHAT THE PLAN INCLUDES, on any
            operation, so nothing is granted. That one is ours rather than
            yours, an ordinary account does not meet it, and it means ask us.


            `insufficient_scope` — This key is scoped and does not hold the
            scope this operation requires — `x-required-scope` on the operation
            names it, and the `WWW-Authenticate` header on the refusal repeats
            it (RFC 6750 §3.1). ⚠️ Retrying cannot help and neither can editing
            the key: scopes are fixed when a key is minted and no endpoint or
            screen can widen them. Issue a new key with the access it needs. A
            key created before scopes existed carries an empty scope list, which
            means EVERY capability, so this refusal cannot reach an integration
            that was already working.


            `test_key_cannot_send` — A `vsk_test_` key tried a send it may not
            make. TWO SITUATIONS PRODUCE IT. (1) `POST
            /api/v1/envelopes/{envelopeId}/send` on an envelope a LIVE key
            created: sending it would email its real recipients and spend real
            allowance, so send it with a live key. (2) Far more often, a
            recipient who would be EMAILED and whose address is not one this
            organisation may send rehearsals to. THE RULE IS ABOUT WHO, NOT
            ABOUT WHETHER: a test key may email anybody who is a MEMBER of the
            sending organisation, and any other address that has CONFIRMED a
            verification link sent to it (Settings → Test recipients). Nobody
            else at all. So a mixed envelope — one `"embedded": true` signer in
            your application and one emailed counterparty — is fully
            rehearsable, provided that counterparty is on the list. An
            `"embedded": true` recipient is never checked against it, because an
            embedded recipient is issued no invitation and is emailed by no code
            path at all. ⚠️ WHY THE LIMIT EXISTS: a sandbox send consumes no
            billing allowance, so an unbounded one would be an unmetered way to
            email strangers from a free account, over a sending domain every
            customer shares. The message names each address that was refused.
            Your options are: add and verify the address; make the recipient
            `"embedded": true`; create the draft with `"send": false`; or send
            with a live key, which may email anybody. What a test key still
            never does is consume billing allowance or produce a sealed artefact
            anybody can be held to — its documents are watermarked on every page
            and sealed by a certificate issued for the sandbox and for nothing
            else, so a PDF reader reports the signature as intact and its issuer
            as untrusted, and everyone who receives one is told so before they
            can open it.


            `api_key_owner_removed` — The person who created this key has left
            the organisation, and everything the key creates or sends — an
            envelope, a batch, a template — is attributed to that person, who
            must still be a member. The key is not revoked and its reads still
            work, and so does managing webhooks; mint a new key from a current
            member and use that.
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                $ref: '#/components/schemas/Error'
                description: The refusal.
        '404':
          description: >-
            `not_found` — No such resource — or none this key’s organisation can
            see, or one that has been archived, or an id that is not a uuid.
            Those four are one answer on purpose: "it exists but is not yours"
            is itself a disclosure. Do not retry; check the id against the list
            endpoint.
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                $ref: '#/components/schemas/Error'
                description: The refusal.
        '409':
          description: >-
            `idempotency_key_reused` — This key was already used for a DIFFERENT
            request. ⚠️ The request itself may be perfectly valid — what
            conflicts is the key against state we already hold, which is what
            409 means and why it is not a 400. Mint a new key. Do not retry with
            this one; it will conflict forever.


            `request_in_progress` — A request carrying this key has not
            finished. We deliberately do not block waiting for it — that would
            hold a connection across a send that calls an email provider N
            times. Retry the identical request; when the first one lands you
            will get its result, replayed.


            `envelope_not_draft` — Only a draft can be sent, and this envelope
            has already left draft — through this API, through the sender’s own
            Send button, or by being voided. ⚠️ THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF
            `envelope_not_sent`, and the two are not interchangeable: that one
            means the envelope has NOT gone out. An envelope never returns to
            draft, so this is terminal — read it with `GET
            /api/v1/envelopes/{envelopeId}` to see where it got to. ⚠️ If you
            were retrying a request that timed out, send the SAME
            `Idempotency-Key` instead and you will be told what the first
            attempt did.
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                $ref: '#/components/schemas/Error'
                description: The refusal.
        '422':
          description: >-
            `recipient_role_missing` — A role that has fields on it was given
            nobody to fill them. Every role the template declares with work to
            do needs a recipient.


            `recipient_role_duplicated` — Two recipients were given one role
            that the template does not route as `cc`. Everyone on a role is
            served the same fields and every one of them must sign, so both
            would answer the same boxes and the completed envelope could never
            be sealed. Give each person a role of their own; several `cc`
            readers may share a role. Answered by the create endpoints, naming
            each `recipients[i].role` that holds the role, and by the send
            endpoint for a draft saved before this was refused.


            `template_has_no_fields` — There are no fields, so the envelope
            would ask nobody to do anything. From a template, place at least one
            field on it in the editor. On `POST /api/v1/envelopes/one-off`,
            which has no template, the document you sent carries no field: add a
            text tag to it, or send `fields`. A batch refuses every row for
            this, because every row shares the template.


            `locked_answer_missing` — A field on this envelope is locked,
            required and carries no answer — three statements that cannot all be
            honoured. A locked answer is the sender’s, so the signer is refused
            if they supply one and the completeness check does not ask them for
            it; once sent, nobody could fill the box and it would seal blank. ⚠️
            THE LOCK MAY NOT HAVE COME FROM YOUR REQUEST — it can be authored on
            the template — so the message names the FIELD rather than a
            `values[i]` path. Send a value for that address, send `{"value": "",
            "locked": false}` to hand it back to the signer, or have the
            template make it optional. ⚠️ THE SAME CODE ALSO MEANS A QUESTION
            NOBODY LEFT COULD ANSWER. Grouped tickboxes — a Race or Gender
            question — are never individually `required`; the question’s own
            `min_selected` is what makes it compulsory. Lock every option of
            such a question with no tick in any of them and it asks for more
            answers than remain within anybody’s reach, which is the same
            unsatisfiable sentence and refuses the same way. There the message
            names the QUESTION, and the remedies are to tick one of the locked
            options, unlock one, or lower the question’s minimum.


            `locked_answer_unusable` — A field on this envelope carries a locked
            answer the field itself will not accept: a value its validation rule
            rejects, one its input format cannot carry, one longer than the
            printed cells of a comb or holding a character one of those cells
            does not accept, a `date` that is not a calendar day, or a dropdown
            answer that is not among the options it offers. ⚠️ A `date` DRAWN AS
            PRINTED CELLS IS MEASURED IN ITS OWN SPELLING: it holds the digits
            its boxes print — `15092026`, not `2026-09-15` — and those digits
            must still name a day that exists, read in the order the field’s
            label states (`Date of birth (DD/MM/YYYY)`). ⚠️ THIS IS NOT
            `locked_answer_missing` — that one is a box with NO answer. This is
            a box with an answer nobody can use: a locked answer is the
            sender’s, the signer may not change it, and their very first save
            would be refused over it on an envelope nobody can edit any more.
            Refused here so that it is still a draft. ⚠️ THE ANSWER MAY NOT HAVE
            COME FROM YOUR REQUEST — a lock and its value can be authored on the
            template, and a rule can be tightened after the answer was fixed —
            so the message names the FIELD rather than a `values[i]` path. Send
            a value that satisfies the field, send `{"locked": false}` to hand
            the box back to the signer, or change the rule on the template. ⚠️
            THE SAME CODE ALSO MEANS A QUESTION THE SENDER ANSWERED MORE TIMES
            THAN IT PERMITS, AND THEN NO FIELD RULE IS BROKEN AT ALL. Grouped
            tickboxes — a Marital status question at `max_selected: 1` — can
            each carry a perfectly good locked tick while together they assert
            more than the question allows; every one of them would seal, side by
            side, on a question that says fewer can be true, and the signer may
            clear none of them. There the message names the QUESTION rather than
            a field, and sending a field-valid value resolves nothing because
            every value already is one. The remedies are to untick one of the
            locked options, to unlock one so the signer chooses, or to raise the
            question’s `max_selected`. ⚠️ AND THAT LAST ONE IS NOT SOMETHING YOU
            CAN SEND: `max_selected` is published by `GET
            /api/v1/templates/{templateId}` and NO ENDPOINT HERE SETS IT — a
            question’s bounds are authored on the template, and its `id` is a
            join key within that response rather than an address this API
            accepts. ⚠️ AND ONE ADDRESS MAY TICK EVERY OPTION AT ONCE, which is
            the commonest way a request reaches this: the options of one
            question often share a `data_key` (all six of Race are `race`), and
            a `values` entry fills EVERY box at its address — so `{"value":
            "true", "locked": true}` there locks a tick into all of them. Give
            the options their own addresses on the template if you need to fix
            exactly one.


            `cannot_be_drawn` — A value, a name or a title contains something
            the sealer cannot draw into the PDF. Asked BEFORE the send rather
            than discovered after everybody has signed. The message names which
            string.
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                $ref: '#/components/schemas/Error'
                description: The refusal.
        '429':
          description: >-
            `rate_limited` — This key has spent its minute. The limit is per KEY
            and per minute, and it follows your PLAN rather than the kind of key
            — 600 requests a minute on every paid plan, 60 on the free plan, and
            the sandbox gets the same number as production so that an
            integration which passes in rehearsal passes live. Every successful
            authenticated response, and this one, carries `RateLimit-Limit`,
            `RateLimit-Remaining` and `RateLimit-Reset` (seconds), so a client
            can slow down before it is made to. TWO OPERATIONS ALSO ANSWER IT
            FOR A REASON OF THEIR OWN. `POST /api/v1/envelopes/batches` costs
            one request per row and is refused WHOLE when its rows do not fit
            what is left of the key’s minute — `RateLimit-Remaining` says how
            many would. `GET
            /api/v1/envelopes/{envelopeId}/documents/{position}/draft` has its
            own per-envelope and per-organisation ceilings on renders each
            minute, and the `message` says which one refused; there
            `Retry-After` is that ceiling’s, while the `RateLimit-*` headers
            still describe the key. `Retry-After` on this refusal is at most 60
            and is read from the stored window rather than computed, so two of
            our instances refusing the same key quote the same instant. ⚠️ A
            REFUSED REQUEST STILL COUNTS: hammering a limit you have already
            exceeded pushes the counter higher rather than holding it. Honour
            `Retry-After`. If one key genuinely needs more throughput, issue a
            second one in Settings — the ceiling is a fairness and blast-radius
            control, not a commercial meter.
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                $ref: '#/components/schemas/Error'
                description: The refusal.
          headers:
            RateLimit-Limit:
              description: >-
                How many requests this key may make per minute: 600 on any paid
                plan and 60 on the free plan, the same in both environments. Per
                key, not per organisation — a second key has its own allowance.
                ⚠️ READ IT RATHER THAN ASSUMING IT: it is the number the
                database applied to this request, so it is right even when this
                description is out of date.
              schema:
                type: integer
                description: Requests permitted in the current minute.
            RateLimit-Remaining:
              description: >-
                How many of them are left, this one already counted. Zero on the
                request that is refused, and zero on every further request of
                that minute — ⚠️ a refused request still counts.
              schema:
                type: integer
                description: Requests remaining in the current minute.
            RateLimit-Reset:
              description: >-
                Seconds until the current minute closes and the allowance
                returns. At most 60, which is what makes the published
                exponential backoff converge in about six doublings rather than
                eleven.
              schema:
                type: integer
                description: Seconds until the window resets.
            Retry-After:
              description: >-
                Seconds to wait before retrying, from the stored end of the
                window. Always present on a 429, and never more than 60. On the
                per-key limit it equals `RateLimit-Reset`; a narrower limit,
                such as the draft render allowance, has a window of its own and
                may ask for a different wait. `x-error-codes` tells you to
                honour it; this is it.
              schema:
                type: integer
                description: Seconds to wait before retrying.
        '500':
          description: >-
            `internal_error` — Ours, not yours. ⚠️ RETRY WITH THE SAME
            `Idempotency-Key` YOU SENT THE FIRST TIME, on any operation that
            takes one — that is what makes a retry safe here, and sending a NEW
            key would create a second envelope or send the same one twice. The
            safe GETs in this document can be retried freely. (This entry used
            to say every operation here was a GET; the write endpoints have
            since shipped, and the reasoning moved with them.)
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                $ref: '#/components/schemas/Error'
                description: The refusal.
      security:
        - ApiKey: []
components:
  schemas:
    Envelope:
      type: object
      description: 'An envelope: a template instantiated with real people and real values.'
      properties:
        id:
          type: string
          format: uuid
          description: The envelope’s id. A bare uuid.
        status:
          type: string
          description: >-
            `draft` or `sent` from this endpoint. Later states arrive as people
            act.
        template_id:
          type:
            - string
            - 'null'
          format: uuid
          description: >-
            The template this was made from, or `null` when there was none — an
            envelope created by `POST /api/v1/envelopes/one-off` carries the
            document itself and never had a template. Branch on `null`, never on
            the empty string.
        title:
          type: string
          description: >-
            What the signers see naming the document. Defaults to the template’s
            name.
        reference:
          type:
            - string
            - 'null'
          examples:
            - hire-2026-0917
          description: >-
            The `reference` you set when you created it, in Unicode NFC, or
            `null`. Not unique, and never changed after creation.
        created_at:
          type: string
          format: date-time
          description: ISO 8601, UTC.
        sent_at:
          type:
            - string
            - 'null'
          format: date-time
          description: ISO 8601, UTC. Null while it is a draft.
        expires_at:
          type:
            - string
            - 'null'
          format: date-time
          description: >-
            ISO 8601, UTC. Null when this envelope has no deadline, which is the
            default. Read back from the stored value rather than echoed, so an
            offset you sent comes back as the same instant in UTC.
        recipients:
          type: array
          description: In routing order.
          items:
            $ref: '#/components/schemas/EnvelopeRecipient'
            description: One recipient.
      required:
        - id
        - status
        - template_id
        - title
        - reference
        - created_at
        - sent_at
        - expires_at
        - recipients
    Error:
      type: object
      description: >-
        The body of every refusal the API returns deliberately, at every status,
        from every endpoint. Such a response is a failure if and only if it
        carries an `error` key — that test is correct even for a client that
        ignores the status line, which is a thing real clients do. An unexpected
        server failure may not have this shape: treat a 5xx without an `error`
        key as an `internal_error`, which is retryable.
      properties:
        error:
          type: object
          description: The refusal. Anything added in future is added INSIDE this object.
          properties:
            code:
              type: string
              description: >-
                A stable snake_case identifier that will never change meaning or
                spelling. This is the contract; branch on it. See
                `x-error-codes` at the root of this document for retry semantics
                per code.
              enum:
                - unauthenticated
                - forbidden
                - insufficient_scope
                - not_found
                - invalid_request
                - rate_limited
                - internal_error
                - service_unavailable
                - idempotency_key_required
                - idempotency_key_reused
                - request_in_progress
                - template_archived
                - template_unusable
                - template_has_no_fields
                - recipient_role_unknown
                - recipient_role_missing
                - recipient_role_duplicated
                - value_subject_unknown
                - value_address_unknown
                - value_not_writable
                - value_not_lockable
                - locked_answer_missing
                - locked_answer_unusable
                - cannot_be_drawn
                - send_allowance_exhausted
                - test_key_cannot_send
                - test_key_cannot_read_documents
                - test_key_cannot_mint
                - webhook_url_invalid
                - webhook_events_invalid
                - webhook_brand_unknown
                - webhook_limit_reached
                - api_key_owner_removed
                - recipient_not_embedded
                - recipient_not_yet_turn
                - recipient_cannot_sign
                - envelope_not_sent
                - envelope_not_draft
                - brand_has_no_embed_origins
                - recipient_cannot_be_embedded
                - batch_interrupted
                - brand_unknown
                - draft_not_available
            message:
              type: string
              description: >-
                ⚠️ PROSE FOR A DEVELOPER READING A LOG, and NOT part of the
                contract. It may be reworded in any release; anything that
                parses it is broken by design.
          required:
            - code
            - message
      required:
        - error
    EnvelopeRecipient:
      type: object
      description: One recipient of an envelope, as it stands.
      properties:
        id:
          type: string
          format: uuid
          description: >-
            This recipient. Published where a template ROLE’s id deliberately is
            not, because a recipient has no natural key — one person may hold
            two roles and two people may hold one.
        role:
          type: string
          description: The template role they were given.
        name:
          type: string
          description: As stored, after normalisation.
        email:
          type: string
          format: email
          description: As stored, after normalisation.
        routing_type:
          type: string
          enum:
            - sign
            - approve
            - cc
          description: >-
            ⚠️ FROM THE TEMPLATE, NEVER FROM THE REQUEST. Whether a role signs,
            approves or is copied in is part of the layout (§3), and a caller
            who could override it could send a document whose signature boxes
            nobody will ever be asked to fill.
        status:
          type: string
          description: >-
            `recipients.status` verbatim. ⚠️ `pending` AFTER A SUCCESSFUL SEND
            IS NORMAL: a sequential template invites only the first position and
            holds the rest back until it empties.
        invitation_delivered:
          type:
            - boolean
            - 'null'
          description: >-
            Whether the email provider reports the invitation as DELIVERED.
            `null` when none was attempted — a draft, a `cc`, an embedded
            recipient, or a position held back.


            ⚠️ ON A READ, THIS NO LONGER ANSWERS `true` AS SOON AS THE SEND
            RETURNS, and it used to. Accepting a message and delivering it are
            different events: we now record delivery only when the provider
            tells us it happened, on the provider's clock. A just-sent
            invitation therefore reads `false` on `GET /api/v1/envelopes/{id}`
            and turns `true` seconds to minutes later.


            ⚠️ THE ONE EXCEPTION IS THE RESPONSE TO `POST .../send` ITSELF,
            where `true` means the provider ACCEPTED the message — the only
            thing anybody knows while the send is still running. That
            operation’s response description says so at length. The same
            recipient can therefore read `true` from the send and `false` from a
            read a second later; the read is the one to decide from.


            ⚠️ `false` IS NOT A BOUNCE. It covers both "the provider refused the
            send" and "we have not been told yet", and you cannot tell those
            apart from this field — do not surface it to a human as a failure.
            `null` is the only value that has never changed meaning: nothing was
            attempted.
        embedded:
          type: boolean
          description: >-
            Whether this recipient is reached by a minted signing URL instead of
            by email. ⚠️ RETURNED HERE PRECISELY BECAUSE DocuSign DOES NOT
            RETURN THEIRS: `clientUserId` is absent from their list endpoints,
            so an integrator who lost their own record of which recipients were
            embedded has no way to ask. When this is true,
            `invitation_delivered` is always `null` — nothing was attempted, and
            nothing was meant to be.
        external_ref:
          type:
            - string
            - 'null'
          description: >-
            Whatever you supplied at creation, normalised to Unicode NFC, or
            `null`: compare it in NFC, not byte for byte. Opaque to us and
            joined on by nothing — it is here so a webhook or this response can
            be matched to your own record of the same human without a side
            table.
      required:
        - id
        - role
        - name
        - email
        - routing_type
        - status
        - invitation_delivered
        - embedded
        - external_ref
  securitySchemes:
    ApiKey:
      type: http
      scheme: bearer
      description: >-
        `Authorization: Bearer vsk_live_…`. Chosen over a bespoke `X-API-KEY`
        header because every client, proxy and log-redaction rule already knows
        this one. What a key may DO is its scopes — see `x-scopes` at the root
        of this document and `x-required-scope` on each operation. The scope
        list is not written here because OpenAPI reserves a requirement’s scope
        array for `oauth2` and `openIdConnect` and requires it to be empty for
        an `http` scheme.

````